Health Policy Analysis Assignment
Health Policy Analysis Assignment
Policy Research
1) Read United States National Healthcare Policies 2015: An Analysis with Implications for the Future of Medicine (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289584966_United_States_National_Healthcare_Policies_2015_An_Analysis_with_Implications_for_the_Future_of_Medicine)
2) Policy Analysis Processes
-Problem Identification
-Process Definition
-Process Analysis
-Qualitative Analysis
-Evaluation & Choice
-Implementation Strategy
-Implementation Planning
-Feedback on Policy Processes
3) Choose four policy analysis processes and apply each one to one of the following policy cases from the list below:
o Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement download (Attached)
o Policy response to the problem of suicide in Australia. (https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13012-015-0221-5.pdf)
o The political economy of austerity and healthcare: Cross-national analysis of expenditure changes in 27 European nations 1995–2011. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259245702_The_political_economy_of_austerity_and_healthcare_Cross-national_analysis_of_expenditure_changes_in_27_European_nations_1995-2011)
o Proposition 63: Should Other States Follow California’s Lead? (https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.642)
4) Provide details on the other four policy processes that were not utilized in your research. How could they be applied? Why would they be applicable?
5) Summarize the key aspects of health policy.
*Must be 10 to 15 double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style.
*Must use at least seven peer-reviewed sources formatted in APA style.
rubric for Health Policy Analysis Assignment
| A (4) | B (3) | C (2) | D/F (1/0) | |
| Focus: Purpose | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness |
| Main idea | Clearly presents a | There is a main idea | Vague sense of a | No main idea |
| main idea and | supported throughout | main idea, weakly | ||
| supports it | most of the paper. | supported | ||
| throughout the | throughout the | |||
| paper. | paper. | |||
| Organization: | Well-planned and | Good overall | There is a sense of | No sense of |
| Overall | well-thought out. | organization, includes | organization, | organization |
| Includes title, | the main | although some of the | ||
| introduction, | organizational tools. | organizational tools | ||
| statement of main | are used weakly or | |||
| idea, transitions and | missing | |||
| conclusion. | ||||
| Organization: | All paragraphs have | Most paragraphs have | Some paragraphs | Para. lack clear ideas |
| Paragraphs | clear ideas, are | clear ideas, are | have clear ideas, | |
| supported with | supported with some | support from | ||
| examples and have | examples and have | examples may be | ||
| smooth transitions. | transitions. | missing and | ||
| transitions are weak. | ||||
| Content | Exceptionally well- | Well-presented and | Content is sound and | Content is not sound |
| presented and | argued; ideas are | solid; ideas are | ||
| argued; ideas are | detailed, developed | present but not | ||
| detailed, well- | and supported with | particularly | ||
| developed, | evidence and details, | developed or | ||
| supported with | mostly specific. | supported; some | ||
| specific evidence & | evidence, but | |||
| facts, as well as | usually of a | |||
| examples and | generalized nature. | |||
| specific details. | ||||
| Research (if | Sources are | Sources are well | Sources support | The paper does not |
| assignment | exceptionally well- | integrated and | some claims made in | use adequate |
| includes a | integrated and they | support the paper’s | the paper, but might | research or if it does, |
| research | support claims | claims. There may be | not be integrated | the sources are not |
| component) | argued in the paper | occasional errors, but | well within the | integrated well. |
| very effectively. | the sources and | paper’s argument. | They are not cited | |
| Quotations and | Works Cited conform | There may be a few | correctly according | |
| Works Cited | to MLA style sheet. | errors in MLA | to MLA style, nor | |
| conform to MLA | style.. | listed correctly on | ||
| style sheet. | the Works Cited | |||
| page. | ||||
| Style: Sentence | Sentences are clear | Sentences are clear | Sentences are | Sentences aren’t |
| structure | and varied in | but may lack | generally clear but | clear |
| pattern, from simple | variation; a few may | may have awkward | ||
| to complex, with | be awkward and there | structure or unclear | ||
| excellent use of | may be a few | content; there may | ||
| punctuation. | punctuation errors. | be patterns of |
Place an order with us on https://assignmentsproficient.com/ and expect the best grades and help from qualified writers
Health Policy Analysis Assignment Health Policy Analysis Assignment
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
