Strategic Implementation of Quality Initiatives
Strategic Implementation of Quality Initiatives
Deliverable 7 – Strategic Implementation of Quality Initiatives
Competencies
1. Analyze the history of healthcare quality improvement and how it shapes current and future quality initiatives.
2. Evaluate patient care clinical outcomes using quality improvement principles.
3. Evaluate healthcare quality measures and their use in diverse populations and settings.
4. Apply models of quality improvement to institutional challenges within the healthcare industry.
5. Develop strategies to engage healthcare staff in quality improvement initiatives.
6. Assess the efficacy of quality improvement processes.
Scenario
You are the CEO of St. Thomas Regional Healthcare Center. Over the past five years, you lead significant quality improvement initiatives resulting in national recognition and Magnet status. You are invited to speak at a national quality improvement conference for other hospital leaders.
Instructions
Complete a strategic plan and a complementing PowerPoint summary presentation, which reflect your process of developing and implementing quality improvement initiatives.
Your strategic plan should include:
1. Summary of changes in healthcare quality improvement initiatives over the past 10 years and how they are influencing healthcare practices.
2. An analysis of state and national health care quality measures and the quality improvement principles used in developing your initiatives.
3. Discuss the Magnet model components and quality improvement initiatives developed to address patient safety outcomes.
4. Explain the quality improvement model used and strategies developed to address patient safety challenges healthcare.
5. Identify two quality improvement initiatives and strategies that include engaging healthcare staff as part of the initiative.
6. Summary of common threats to quality improvement in healthcare and apply a quality improvement model and strategies neutralizing the threats.
Create a PowerPoint presentation, which includes either speaker notes or a voiceover, for the conference that summarizes the strategic plan.
Do you have a similar assignment that you would wish our expert writers from Assignments Proficient to handle for you? Place an order with us on https://assignmentsproficient.com/ and expect the best grades and help from qualified writers
A (4) | B (3) | C (2) | D/F (1/0) | |
Focus: Purpose | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness |
Main idea | Clearly presents a | There is a main idea | Vague sense of a | No main idea |
main idea and | supported throughout | main idea, weakly | ||
supports it | most of the paper. | supported | ||
throughout the | throughout the | |||
paper. | paper. | |||
Organization: | Well-planned and | Good overall | There is a sense of | No sense of |
Overall | well-thought out. | organization, includes | organization, | organization |
Includes title, | the main | although some of the | ||
introduction, | organizational tools. | organizational tools | ||
statement of main | are used weakly or | |||
idea, transitions and | missing | |||
conclusion. | ||||
Organization: | All paragraphs have | Most paragraphs have | Some paragraphs | Para. lack clear ideas |
Paragraphs | clear ideas, are | clear ideas, are | have clear ideas, | |
supported with | supported with some | support from | ||
examples and have | examples and have | examples may be | ||
smooth transitions. | transitions. | missing and | ||
transitions are weak. | ||||
Content | Exceptionally well- | Well-presented and | Content is sound and | Content is not sound |
presented and | argued; ideas are | solid; ideas are | ||
argued; ideas are | detailed, developed | present but not | ||
detailed, well- | and supported with | particularly | ||
developed, | evidence and details, | developed or | ||
supported with | mostly specific. | supported; some | ||
specific evidence & | evidence, but | |||
facts, as well as | usually of a | |||
examples and | generalized nature. | |||
specific details. | ||||
Research (if | Sources are | Sources are well | Sources support | The paper does not |
assignment | exceptionally well- | integrated and | some claims made in | use adequate |
includes a | integrated and they | support the paper’s | the paper, but might | research or if it does, |
research | support claims | claims. There may be | not be integrated | the sources are not |
component) | argued in the paper | occasional errors, but | well within the | integrated well. |
very effectively. | the sources and | paper’s argument. | They are not cited | |
Quotations and | Works Cited conform | There may be a few | correctly according | |
Works Cited | to MLA style sheet. | errors in MLA | to MLA style, nor | |
conform to MLA | style.. | listed correctly on | ||
style sheet. | the Works Cited | |||
page. | ||||
Style: Sentence | Sentences are clear | Sentences are clear | Sentences are | Sentences aren’t |
structure | and varied in | but may lack | generally clear but | clear |
pattern, from simple | variation; a few may | may have awkward | ||
to complex, with | be awkward and there | structure or unclear | ||
excellent use of | may be a few | content; there may | ||
punctuation. | punctuation errors. | be patterns of |
Strategic Implementation of Quality Initiatives