Inherent controversy and contemporary topics

Inherent controversy and contemporary topics

topic : Inherent controversy and contemporary topics

This kind of essay, however, is different. This is a journalistic inquiry essay, in which you will choose a topic that has some inherent controversy and is contemporary (excluding medical marijuana, legalizing drugs, lowering the drinking age, and others we will discuss in class). You will research the topic, using both academic (peer-reviewed) and “lay” sources, including magazines, other news sources, interviews, case studies, etc. Whatever you do should interest you. Your prose can take a journalistic narrative style (think New Yorker, Harpers, The Atlantic) or, if you are too uncomfortable, you can default to a regular academic essay. Graphics incorporated into the text and into your discussion and analysis are fine as well. You will need to make an argument/advocate for some action. You need to consult a variety of sources for your topic. All sources should be properly cited within the text and again on a works cited page. Your paper must have at least six sources, at least three of which are from scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources. You will also need a works cited page at the end of your paper.

Remember to think about framing for this essay: how will you construct the fruits of your investigation, discussion, and well-crafted writing into a readable, searching, and memorable essay that will invite a well-educated audience, such as found in the New Yorker, etc., into your work? We will be reading a variety of models for this assignment; it is up to you to choose a framing device that works for you. Remember: communications research demonstrates that how one frames a topic has a direct bearing on how the audience will receive it (think political campaigns). How one backs up one’s argument lends credibility (think research and analysis). And how well one chooses words, crafts sentences, and writes creatively will determine how memorable your writing will be (think Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.).

From this beginning, you can initiate the Investigative Paper process, which might include:

Identify, define, and analyze the problem: what generates the problem? What is given, what is unknown, what are the criteria for solving the topic? What are factors – historical, contextual, systemic, economic, etc.?

Determine the information that is appropriate for solving the problem, and then research/find it, and assess its validity and authority

Assess the information critically (don’t just “throw the research” into the paper) – analyze it for how it addresses your controversy). Remember to include a counterargument

Determine what graphics might further illustrate your topic. Remember to cite them, and discuss them in your text.

Offer a range of potential solutions to the problem

Evaluate your solutions according to your criteria, choose the most viable option, and take a stand. Think about the contribution you will be making to this field.

Length – 6-8 pages plus Works Cited page

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:47 AM Edwin Murithi <kariukiedu2020@gmail.com> wrote:
Citation style: AMA
Health Disparities Commentary : A commentary is a scholarly comment on a newly published article. The goal of this assignment is to
react to the impact of culture/race/ethnicity/residential location etc. described within a peer-reviewed
journal article related to health disparities. The goal of publishing commentaries is to advance the
research field by providing a forum for varying perspectives on a certain topic under consideration in the
journal. The author of a commentary should be eager to present a new and/or unique viewpoint on
existing problems, fundamental concepts, or prevalent notions, or wants to discuss the implications of a
newly implemented innovation. A commentary may also draw attention to current advances and
speculate on future directions of a certain topic, as well as state a personal opinion. While a commentary
may be critical of an article published in the journal, it is important to maintain a respectful tone that
may be critical of ideas or conclusions but not of authors.

In summary, a commentary may be:
1. A critical challenge to one or more aspects of the focal article, arguing for a position other than
that taken in the focal article;
2. An elaboration or extension of the position taken in the focal article, basically sympathetic to the
position taken in the focal article but pushing the argument further;
3. An application of a theoretical or methodological perspective that sheds light on the issues
addressed in the focal article; and/or
4. A comment on the applicability of the issues raised in the focal article to other settings, or to other
cultures.

Inherent controversy and contemporary topics will require you to write a commentary article in response to the following
journal articles recently published in the American Journal of Health Education
Peacock, J., Bowling, A., Finn, K., & McInnis, K. (2021). Use of Outdoor Education to Increase
Physical Activity and Science Learning among Low-Income Children from Urban Schools.
American Journal of Health Education, 52(2), 92-100.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19325037.2021.1877222

Use these simple guidelines when writing your health disparities commentary paper:
• Do not include general praise for the focal article.
• Cite only works absolutely essential to support your point.
• Use a short title that emphasizes your key message. (It should be clear in context that all
commentaries are a reaction to a particular paper).
• Make clear your take-home message.
• Make sure there is full author information (name, affiliation, address, phone, email).
The assignment should be double-spaced, ~6 pages of content (1300-1500 words), subject headers, 12-
point font, Times New Roman, 1” margins all around, a title page, abstract, and reference page in AMA
format.

Inherent controversy and contemporary topics Assignment Formatting Policies:
• All written assignments must be word-processed.
• Reference all works cited using the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines. AMA is a
standardized formatting and style used for research papers in the social and behavioral sciences.
• In the AMA style of writing, direct quotations from articles are used sparingly and are discouraged.
In practice, it is better to paraphrase or summarize source materials. This means to re-write an
author’s ideas in your own words. After paraphrasing the information, cite the author(s) from
whom you took the information to give them credit.

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:45 AM Edwin Murithi <kariukiedu2020@gmail.com> wrote:
Consider the following definitions to answer the questions below:

Polit and Beck (2008, p3) define evidence-based practice as the use of best clinical evidence in making patient care decisions … such evidence typically comes from research conducted by nurses and other health care professionals

Sackett et al. (1996, p71), who defined evidence-based medicine as the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual patient. It means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research

Which definition do you identify with best?
What is it about the definition captures your attention?
Why is it the “right” definition?
Create your own definition.

Do you have a similar assignment that you would wish our expert writers from Assignments Proficient to handle for you? Place an order with us on https://assignmentsproficient.com/ and expect the best grades and help from qualified writers

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"