Fundamentals of Management Group Paper

Fundamentals of Management Group Paper
Fundamentals of Management
MN4002
Portfolio part 2: Individual Paper based on group project
Due: Monday, 1 February 2021, 3pm
Portfolio part 2: Individual Paper based on group project due in week 15.
• Report to be submitted using Turnitin (in Weblearn) before 3pm on Monday, 1 February
2021.
• Report needs to contain 1,500 words
Learning outcome (LO):
LO2: demonstrate an in-depth understanding of teams and motivational theories reflect on own
management and employability skills
Assignment task:
This assignment is based on a group presentation (due in week11, w/c 4 January 2021)
1. Build a group of 3 to 4 students, identify a historic person you find interesting and research
its history.
2. Link this person’s actions to the CVF: What actions has this person engaged in that show
behaviours related to the four approaches?
In your individual assignment (due week 15)
1. Based on the presentation in week 11, write a report that reflects on your group work using
teamwork and motivational theories.
2. Based on the information you gathered about your own actions. How would you describe
yourself using the CVF’s Action Imperatives discussed in workshop 9?
The criteria for marking your report include:
– Demonstrate in-depth understanding of teams and motivation theories
– Show ability to apply the CVF to own actions and behaviours.
– Structure, referencing, research.
This assignment is weighted at 60%.

Grading Scheme for Portfolio Part 2 for Fundamentals of Management Group Paper

 

Individual Report Fundamentals of Management Group Paper

 

  Marking criteria Letter   Mark
    grade   recorded
  The work shows evidence of: A-   70-100%
  Explains in depths how content and process theories can be used to improve      
  motivation and productivity in a team.      
  Describes very relevant and theoretically sound techniques to improve teamwork by      
  using the literature used in class.      
  Very good application of CVF, referring to own actions and behaviours in a very      
  reflective manner.      
  Excellent structure, very coherent and logical, easy to follow through.      
  Excellent referencing in text and list following Harvard system without mistakes.      
  Evidence of very wide reading and research in recent publications, relevant books      
  and journals.      
         
  The work shows evidence of: B   60-69%
  Explains well how content and process theories can be used to improve motivation      
  and productivity in a team.      
  Describes relevant and good techniques to improve teamwork based on the      
  literature used.      
  Good application of CVF, referring to own actions and behaviours.      
  Coherent and logical structure throughout.      
  Good referencing in text and list following Harvard system with only minor mistakes.      
  Evidence of wide reading and research in mostly highly relevant and recent      
  publication.      
         
  The work shows: C   50-59%
  Explain some aspects how content and process theories can be used to improve      
  motivation and productivity in a team.      
  Describes some techniques to improve teamwork, not all based on relevant      
  literature.      
  The CVF is mentioned, but the link to own actions and behaviours is rather weak.      
  Coherent and logical structure in most parts provided.      
  Attempt to use references in text and list, not always following Harvard system.      
  Evidence of some reading.      
         
  The work shows: D   43-49%
  Either content or process theories of motivation are discussed. The application to      
  the work in a team is very weak      
  Limited description of techniques to improve teamwork. Theoretical background is      
  missing.      
  Own actions and behaviours have not been clearly embedded in the CVF.      
  Some structure detectable, but not very coherent or logical.      
  Follows Harvard system, but not throughout.      
  Evidence of reading is limited.      
         
  Presents some material related to the topic. Some evidence of understanding of the Pass   40-42%
  task set. Poor structure. Attempt to use sources, very limited use of Harvard      
  referencing.      
         
  Presents minimal material related to the topic. Little evidence of understanding of Condoned   30-39%
  the task set. Poor structure. Attempt to use sources, Harvard referencing not used. Pass    
         
  Does not address the task set. No evidence of understanding either the task or the F2   Under
  subject matter. No evidence of scholarship.     30%
         
      2

 

Fail – Non-submission.                                                                                                                                    F3                   0%

Place an order with us on https://assignmentsproficient.com/ and expect the best grades and help from qualified writers

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"